I recently read and realized that certain elections with big margins of victory are "wave" elections (obvious) and others are "undertow" elections (surprising and beneath the surface).
The Quinnipiac/CBS/NYT poll of FL/OH/VA shows Pres. Obama's leads vanishing (except in OH): FL - 10/28: O+1, 9/26: O+9; OH - 10/28: O+5, 10/22: O+5; VA - 10/28: O+2, 10/11: O+5
These numbers are even more significant when we take into consideration their current party ID samples and compare them with 2008/2010 CNN exit polls:
FL - Now: D+7, '08: D+3, '10: Even
OH - Now: D+8; '08: D+8, '10: R+1
VA - Now: D+8, '08: D+6, '10: N/A (no governor/senate election)
So let me get this straight, FL/VA will increase their 2012 Democratic voter turnout advantage by 4/2 in 2008. Seriously? And OH will remain D+8, even though it was R+1 in 2010?
Thus, the undertow narrative: The current poll shows the President "leading" with Democrat/Republican turnout models that are the same or BETTER for him than 2008. Wow. In other words, if FL/VA had the same partisan D/R turnout as 2008 and ignoring independents (which Romney leads the poll in each state by 5 points or more -- 21 in VA!), the President would be losing FL by 3, VA would be tied, and OH would remain the same.
Here's the beneath-the-surface problem for the President. Sure, he's leading in the top-line, head-to-head numbers, yet no one outside liberal la-la land (or maybe even there) believes he will increase his base's 2008 turnout advantage in FL/VA or maintain it in OH.
How do we know the D+ turnout advantage will be lower in 2012 than 2008? First of all, common sense: In 2010, the D+ turnout advantage in FL/OH flipped 3/9 points towards Republicans. Will it really flip back to Democrats 7/9 in 2012? I think someone would have to live in a Doc Brown alternate universe to accept such a return (or improvement), in today's political climate. Long gone is candidate Hope and Change and many O 2008 supporters have switched their allegiance or will be staying home in 2012.
What's the empirical evidence or hard data for this 2008/2012 shift? Both Gallup and Rasmussen predict a Republican voter turnout advantage in 2012. http://www.redstate.com/2012/10/26/swingometer-gallup-party-id-figures-predict-solid-romney-win/ Yet, the media fails to peek behind the curtians. Skim this CNN update, e.g., breaking down our current Quinn/CBS/NYT polls: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/31/polls-close-contests-in-ohio-florida-and-virginia/ ANY mention of Democrat oversampling? "Oversampling? What's that?" wonders CNN.
Here's where the undertow scenario emerges: The President's leads in the Quinn/CBS/NYT poll all cling to an other-world-assumption that he will crush Republican enthusiasm with a huge Democrat turnout advantage, a la 2008 or better. The media, liberal pundits, and liberals all believe (or ignore or are ignorant of) it, while Independents (who are strongly backing Romney) and invigorated/galvanized Republicans know otherwise. Sure, the election's "in the bag" for President Attack and Blame, yet it might come as a shock to liberals and the media when he's sucked under the 2012 Republican current and tossed out on November 6.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/10/30/are_we_looking_at_an_undertow_election.html (where I got the undertow anlogy)
[Further undertow thoughts: *MI* is only +3 Obama right now (he won MI by 16 in 2008!) http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/mi/michigan_romney_vs_obama-1811.html, with MN and PA(!) both in play, as well. Republicans are killing it with absentee ballots over 2008 in OH with a 58% reduction of Democrat advantage: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvEOdIaw0fPNdHVOZnFENDdDYVFTRi1UMlgxQ0F4OVE#gid=0. OH usually has less D+ turnout than the country and many OH "already voted" voters may actually be, cough, lying: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331593/why-romney-doesnt-need-poll-lead-ohio-josh-jordan http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331854/national-polls-vs-ohio-polls-which-are-right-josh-jordan Finally, why I, also, believe Pres. Obama is toast: http://www.redstate.com/2012/10/26/why-i-think-obama-is-toast/]
No comments:
Post a Comment